왜 같냐고? 이 대화에서는 창이 없기 때문이야. 단병기간의 싸움에서 다른 간격을 취했다는 근거가 있다면 말해주길 바람. 굉장히 궁금하거든
더블릿의 경우 날카로운 무기에 대한 효과적인 방호력을 제공한다는 문장은 발견 할 수 있지만 둔기에 대한 방호력을 제공한단 말은 안 보이는데 발견시 링크좀

내 첫 댓글부터 하지만 엘프놈 경장갑이죠? 라고 경장갑 상대를 전제하고 갔는데 무슨 소릴 또 하는거야
또한 이미 한번 반박했을텐데, 그렇게 커브 틀면 쇠몽둥이에서 메이스 같은 애들도 같은 부류니까 등장 가능하다고
이어서, 중세 싸움터 기반에서 자잘한 난전이 많았다면 네가 들고온 홀스맨 픽은 머단히 구려. 그 글을 잘 읽어봐 

The injury caused by the weapon was also small and rarely immediately fatal. Additionally, if swung too hard, the weapon often became embedded in the victim or their armour, making retrieval difficult

그정도로 차려입으면 보통 경장갑이라고 안하지 않어?
넘 비싼데

In the medieval era, chainmail was a significant investment, and its cost varied depending on factors such as the quality of materials, craftsmanship, and the specific type of chainmail being produced.

The labor involved in creating chainmail was intensive. Each individual ring had to be meticulously crafted, shaped, and riveted or welded by hand. A single hauberk could require over 20,000 rings and take a skilled armorer several months to complete. Consequently, the labor cost alone was substantial.

The choice of material also played a vital role in determining the price. Higher quality steel or the use of alternate metals like bronze would drive up the price. The complexity and length of the chainmail, such as whether it included a coif or extended to cover the legs, would further add to the cost.

Acquiring chainmail could be a burdensome expense for a common soldier or knight. Often, the wealthier nobles and knights could afford the best quality chainmail. In some instances, rulers or lords would supply their elite soldiers with chainmail as part of their equipment.

In today’s currency, the cost of a full hauberk might equate to several thousand dollars. It was a significant expenditure that reflected the wearer’s status and martial commitment in the Middle Ages. The high cost of chainmail underscores the value placed on protection and craftsmanship during this fascinating historical period.