미중간의 무역협상은 이제 막바지란 팩트:) 

중국의 마지막 몽니= 돼지정은이의 미사일 발사:) 

중국이 과연 이번 주 워싱턴에서 예정된 미중무역협상 마지막 단계인

즉 미중무역협상타결 후 = Monitoring System을 만들자고 하는 걸 끝까지 거부할 수 있을까?:) 

절대 못한다는 팩트:) 

이제 중국시진핑의 영구집권의 꿈은 물건너갔다는 팩트:) 

한국은 (원래 4월과 10월 발표하지만 아직까지도 발표하지 않는 미국무부의 환율조작대상국으로 지정될 수 있다는 팩트:) 

시진핑과 그의 개돼지 문재인과 김정은은 끝났다는 팩트:) 

시차의 문제일 뿐:) 

아 너무 바쁘다, 시간 없어서 일단 휘리릭:) 

p.s 계속하는 말처럼 결국 LG전자같은 미국으로 확실하게 Global Headquater를 옮기는 다국적기업이란 팩트:)

China is considering canceling this week’s trade talks after Trump’s tariffs threat, sources say

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

(5월 04일 포스트) 

일베에서부터 계속하는 말처럼 김정은에게는 단 두가지 선택 밖에 없다는 팩트:) 

1. 고르바초프처럼 북한개방개혁을 한 후 미국으로 망명

2. 차우세스크나 카다피처럼 죽음을 맞든 가 두가지 사실 밖에 없다는 팩트:)  

김정은이 어제 방사포 몇발을 동해로 발사한 건 북돼지의 의지라기 보다는 미중간의 협상에 따른 

마지막 중국의 몽니라고 봐도 무방하다는 팩트:) 

일베에서부터 주우우욱 내 포스트를 본 게이들은 잘 알겠지만, 김정은이 단독으로 절대 미사일 또는 ICBM 핵실험따위를

할수는 없다는 팩트:)

결국 북돼지의 주인인 시진핑의 의지란 팩트:) 

시간없어서 나중에 휘리릭:)

North Korea fired numerous short-range projectiles off its eastern coast, South Korea said, in Kim Jong Un’s latest and most provocative signal of frustration with talks with U.S. President Donald Trump.

The significance of the test was difficult to assess as South Korea revised its account of the nature and scale of the weapons discharged from the eastern port of Wonsan just after 9 a.m. Saturday local time. After first calling them “missiles,” South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff later changed its description to “projectiles,” saying greater clarity would require more analysis.

The details are key since Trump has cited Kim’s self-imposed freeze on missile and nuclear weapons tests to support his decision to continue negotiations with the North Korean leader. South Korea’s descriptions of the incident suggested shorter-range rockets or artillery that would be less likely for the U.S. to interpret as a violation of Kim’s pledge to refrain from testing.

“We are aware of North Korea’s actions tonight. We will continue to monitor as necessary,” White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said. National Security Adviser John Bolton briefed the president about the launch, according to a senior administration official, who asked for anonymity to discuss the matter.

The weapons were fired from the Hodo Peninsula, which has been the site of past live-fire artillery exercises, and traveled 70 to 200 kilometers (45 to 125 miles), the joint chiefs said earlier Saturday. The Yonhap News Agency later reported that the weapons fired were “not missiles,” citing unidentified lawmakers briefed by intelligence officials.

“Missiles are projectiles, but South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff might be using ‘projectile’ to imply an unguided rocket, like one of North Korea’s older rocket artillery systems,” said Ankit Panda, an adjunct senior fellow at the Federation of American Scientists. “This could also be a politicized attempt to make the word ‘missile’ not so prominent, in case that creates the kind of news cycle that Trump doesn’t want.”

The weapons test was nonetheless Kim’s most significant provocation since he launched an intercontinental ballistic missile in November 2017, declared his nuclear weapons program “complete” and opened talks. South Korea President Moon Jae-in’s spokeswoman condemned the incident, saying in a statement that they “go against” a military agreement the two Koreas reached in September to halt “hostile activities.”

Kim has expressed increasing frustration since Trump refused his demands for sanctions relief and walked out of their second summit in Hanoi in February. After a year of talks, Kim has made only a pledge to “work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula,” without defining the phrase.

The North Korean leader accused the U.S. of “bad faith” during a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Vladivostok last week. He had earlier told North Korea’s Supreme People’s Assembly that he would wait “with patience till the end of this year” for the U.S. to make a better offer.

A shorter-range test could also signal displeasure with South Korea’s participation in joint military drills with the U.S., despite Trump’s decision to scale down those exercises. North Korean state media has repeatedly complained about the drills in recent weeks and Kim pledged “corresponding acts” during his speech last month to the rubber-stamp parliament.

South Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha discussed Saturday’s incident with U.S. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo by phone, the ministry said in a statement. Nuclear envoy Lee Do-hoon made a separate call to U.S. Special Representative Stephen Biegun, who is slated to visit Japan and South Korea next week.

“This is an expected move from North Korea -- not too provoking, but urging the U.S. to take a slightly stronger stance than their initial one,” said Kim Hyun-wook, of the Korean National Diplomatic Academy. “This seems like a message for Stephen Biegun’s planned trip to the peninsula.”

Japan’s defense ministry said Saturday that the country had not detected any missiles entering its exclusive economic zone and as such there was no immediate impact to its national security.

Although Saturday’s launch was the most significant since Kim’s detente with Trump, North Korea has announced more limited weapons tests in recent months. Kim personally oversaw the test-firing of a “new-type tactical guided weapon” last month, which South Korea later said appeared to be a system intended for ground combat and not a ballistic missile.

Descriptions of the current incident suggested weapons ranging from rocket-propelled artillery to multiple rockets fired from launchers, analysts said. Firing such a weapon could serve a range of goals from pushing back against South Korea, to reassuring Kim’s domestic audience of his leadership.

“The range they have would only be really good for hitting targets across the border in South Korea,” said Nathan Hunt, an independent defense researcher. “It could be seen that this was a signal to the ROK that the DPRK is losing patience,” referring to South Korea’s and North Korea’s formal names.

— With assistance by John Harney, Justin Sink, and Natnicha Chuwiruch